How did the editor respond to our suggestion

Author: glok

August undefined, 2024

Web17 de jan. de 2024 · The handling Editor, based on all the information available, including referee reports, can nominate the paper for its particular interest, as well as clarity of … Web13 de abr. de 2024 · I find the "new and improved" Editor UI in R2024b to be ... Sometimes I hit tab multiple times just waiting for the editor to respond. I used to double-click on an …

Responding to Manuscript Reviewer and Editor Comments

Web12 de fev. de 2015 · According to Dr. van Harten, the simplest way to ensure your responses are informative is to "copy paste each reviewer comment, and type your … Web21 de nov. de 2024 · So the answer is yes, editors sometimes rewrite. Their job is to help the book come out in all its potential and to serve well the publishing line of the house. csoc online course

NPR to quit Twitter after being labelled ‘state-affiliated media’

Web10 de mai. de 2024 · The etiquette of suggestions: Good manners and wisdom prevent you from saying, “That’s stupid.”. #1. Suggestions impose social obligations. You need to consider and respond. #2. People believe their stupid suggestions are smart. We believe our suggestions are helpful. That’s why we offered them. Web6 de mar. de 2024 · When writing the response, ensure that you provide a detailed and succinct response to each and every point that the reviewer has identified. This is what the reviewer is looking for and increases your chances of getting an acceptance. What Changes Did You Make? Ensure you clearly highlight the changes you intend to make. WebIt is not a guideline on ‘how to write a journal paper’ but useful comments and suggestions are provided. The final part of this chapter covers questions related to the submission and revision ... eah housing website

Responding to editor decision letters and reviewers

How should I respond if I cannot address a reviewer

Web7 de mai. de 2024 · It is up to you. The editors clearly think you should have a chance to respond to the reviewers, then they will evaluate if your paper is wowrthwhile for publication. The review is not a democratic process, the editor may at any point overrule the suggestion of the reviewers. The editor may even have an idea about the topic you are … Web20 de out. de 2024 · 1. Read the letter from the editor Read the letter from the editor carefully and make sure that you have indeed received a request to revise and resubmit … cso combined sewerWebpraised. Errors were ignored, and no suggestions for im-provement were made. No grade was marked on any paper. One week from the time the first papers were written, they were returned to the students. Students were asked to reread their papers, noting any comment that had been written on them. They were asked to consider how they might cso community action

"WebReturn the revised manuscript and response letter within the time period the editor tells you; Examples: Reviewer comment: “In your analysis of the data you have chosen to … " - How did the editor respond to our suggestion

How did the editor respond to our suggestion

How, when, and why you should appeal an editor’s decision - Cell

Web2. Prepare a document of response. Think about every comment and how you wish to respond. When writing your responses, be clear, concise and use evidence to show your changes or reasons why you have dealt with the comments in a particular way. 3. Respond to every comment and suggested change, one by one. Web18 de jun. de 2015 · If a reviewer provides suggestions for improvements, ideally the authors should respond to them. This does not mean that the author will necessarily …

Did you know?

Web1.1 Responses from journals, and responding to them. 1.2 Revising your manuscript. 2 Structure and style of a journal rebuttal letter. 2.1 Polite, generic header and salutation. 2.2 Express thanks. 2.3 Give an overview/executive brief. 2.4 End the letter on a positive note. 2.5 Give your point-by-point responses. Web12 de out. de 2024 · The response letter will typically begin with a summary of changes, pointing out new data and new analyses performed in response to the most essential criticisms of all the reviewers. Note that, at your discretion, the response may include figures and tables that are for the reviewers' benefit but will not go into the manuscript or …

Webappreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers dedicated to providing feedback on our manuscript and are grateful for the insightful comments on and valuable … Web23 de abr. de 2024 · Step 3: Write your letter to the editor. Here are the requirements: Letters should be about 150 to 200 words. They should include the headline and a link to …

WebTake a day (or at least a couple of hours), and fully embrace the editor's suggestions. Think about why h/she made them, and think about how you would revise your paper to fully incorporate his/her suggestions, and in what aspects it would make the paper better. … Web11 de nov. de 2024 · Unfortunately, the authors failed to update the reference list, and failed to respond to these comments. There are no changes on the manuscript. Authors should address any comments given by reviewers, in a point-to-point response; even if they do not want to consider the comments or suggestions from reviewers they must address their …

Web7 de mai. de 2024 · The purpose of this editorial is to offer suggestions to authors about some effective ways to respond to reviewers’ and editors’ comments, leading to manuscript revision and subsequent better chances for possible acceptance by the Journal. 1. Understand the importance of the peer review process.

Web8 de ago. de 2016 · Here are responses to the reviewer comments: Comment 1: Language editing for the manuscript has been done. I have used the services of a professional editing company for the same. Editorial Formatting comments: All the suggestions regarding editorial formatting have been incorporated. Comment 2: Use a 1" margin on all sides: Done cso construction materialsWebResponse to Editor Dear editor, We thank you very much for the comments and suggestions. The comments and suggestions are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our manuscript. We have made revisions according to the referees’ comments and suggestions, as described in the authors’ response. Comments cso concert scheduleWeb18 de mai. de 2016 · Answer: I think you should just be honest and mention to the editor that while you agree with the reviewer’s suggestion, you had not thought of this at the … eahiker gmail.comWebEditors and reviewers are not infallible; on the other hand, there should usually be a reason why the remark has been made.You may think it irrelevant, but the reviewer obviously … cso construction supplyWeb11 de set. de 2024 · A Sample Response to the Comments of Peer Reviewers. Edward Researcher. Palaeography Institute. 1717 Writer’s Lane. South River, MI, USA, 484848. 734-734-7344. [email protected]. Dr Helen … eahinfo esterovet.comWeb3 de set. de 2024 · For a desk rejection, if you are able to convince the editor of the conceptual advance or add data to extend the scope of the manuscript, the editor would … cso concert tonightWebDear editor, We very much appreciated your encouraging and insightful comments and those of the referees. We have endeavoured to respond to all suggestions and comments, which further improved the understanding and potential impact of our manuscript. Detailed responses are given below (in blue). ea hideout\u0027s